I love simplicity. There is a beauty to things basic and pure. There is a sense of wholesomeness, of comfort. I like its unpretentious existence. I like how it brings a sense of fulfillment and satisfaction.
I love extravagance. There is a beauty to things gourmet and lovely. There is a sense of indulgence, of enjoyment. I like its pleasurable luxury. I like how it brings a sense of delight and fun.
Simplicity is overrated. It often translates into harder, longer, or slower. It may mean wasted time and energy. It’s usually inefficient and uneconomical. It doesn’t even really make sense.
Extravagance is overrated. It often translates into costlier, lengthier, or slower. It may mean wasted time and money. It’s usually mindless and uneconomical. It doesn’t even really make sense.
It’s a paradox.
We did the back-to-basic lifestyle at the farm and enjoyed many aspects of it. I believe it offered opportunities that were needed for us, our children, and our family as a whole. Through being mindfully simple, we experienced things that we wouldn’t have otherwise, such as cooking on a wood stove.
But we also enjoy bounty. The blessing of living here in this old ‘mansion’ is also very appreciated. It’s made some wonderful things possible, like being able to open our home like never before.
We love farms and the country side, and take great delight in old treasures. Yet we also enjoy big cities and eclectic college towns. Rolling pastures and city lights each have their own, unique kind of beauty. 900 square feet with a sawdust toilet or thousands of square feet with leaded glass windows. Daisies in a mason jar are pretty, and yellow roses in a crystal vase are beautiful. Get my drift?
The problem is that most of us tend towards one, and then end up rejecting the other. When simplicity is romanticized, trendy things are ridiculed. When indulgence is embraced, basic things are looked down at. It’s as if we get in one mindset and suddenly fail to appreciate the benefits of the other. It’s not either-or, just my-way-or-the-highway.
The way I see it is we have this funny way of getting tunnel vision. If we start choosing to live a bit more down-to-earth and adapt a minimal lifestyle, it tends toward a self-righteous, “I’m so pure and wholesome” attitude. It’s not enough to quietly enjoy the blessings of a plain life. We begin to think everyone should sew their own clothes or grow their own wheat.
On the flip side, if we choose to live a bit more excessively, it tends toward a condescending, “Who do they think they are, Amish?!” attitude. We begin to think we actually deserve the excessive things we purchase, and do not know if we could function without them.
Why do lifestyle choices affect us this way? I believe it is because we have a choice. If we all lived identically and knew no other way, there would be no reason to compare or see any nobleness in how we were living. It would just be the way things were.
But, most of do choose, and it is the thought-processes, worldview, and experiences that direct those choices that ultimately cause us to believe the choice itself proves we are “better”. Better person, better neighbor, better citizen, better than what we were before. It only stands to reason that if believe in our own hearts that our lifestyle choices made us better, if everyone else did the same thing, they’d be better, too.
Of course, most people would read that and think, “I don’t do that.” Think about it. Be honest. I think we all do to a certain extent. Family A turns from a nice home and well-paying but stressful job to move to a fixer-upper in the country. They feel closer as a family, life slows down enough for them to feel like they can actually enjoy it, and they experience a deeper satisfaction through working close to creation and the seasons. Eventually though, a changed personal view of what is most important morphs into a judgment against those who still live the way they once did.
Family B rises from a menial, just scraping by existence, to a comfortable income. They enjoy not having to worry about paying the bills every week, take more relaxing vacations where they can just enjoy being together, and splurge on remodeling. Slowly their enjoyable life causes them to look at those who live simply with suspicion and ridicule. Forgetting all the little things they themselves once enjoyed, they only feel condemnation for living the good life.
It’s not just the ability that we have to choose our lifestyle that gives us bad attitudes, though. Some of the opinions held against simple or extravagant are justified. Those who tend to live more simply ease into such a relaxed state that they no longer see their own untidiness, even sloppiness. Also, they often tend to be more recluse and cut-off from the society at large, except for perhaps close friends and family and fellow church members, and therefore have no impact on anything except their own little box they’ve built around themselves.
In the same vein, those who tend to live more extravagantly usually get there by digging themselves deeply into debt. They add even more to the red dollar signs by getting sucked in to the frivolous expenditures that they now see as necessities. Perhaps their families tend to grow apart, as each is busy with their own pursuits.
(But I don’t choose, some may say. I’m just stuck in this lifestyle situation that fate dealt me. Well, you still choose how you respond to your situation. It still applies.)
So here is the crux of the matter. Neither lifestyle means anything. You have to choose something, so do it. But don’t for one second think that it will really denote anything of significance. Let me give you two extreme examples of both sides.
Gandhi. Everyone recognizes that name. For some people, they envision a strange little man with crazy ideas. Others view him with varying degrees of awe. Whatever your opinion of him, he had a huge impact on the entire world, especially through the extreme simplicity he attempted to live by. Once quite well off, even working as a lawyer, he sold everything and gave it to the poor. Over the years, he pared down his living essentials to include what he could carry in a small sack, a pocket watch, and sometimes a goat, for milk of course! He wore a scratchy loincloth, even when visiting lofty world leaders and kings. He ate only plain, mostly tasteless foods, and often fasted for days. He defined ascetic living.
Why did he do this? I think most would be surprised to learn that it was Jesus’ teachings that motivated him the most. He attempted to live exactly what Jesus preached during what is known as “Sermon on the Mount”. (Christians, you would do good to heed why a man who modeled his life after the teachings of Jesus deliberately chose to stay outside the “Christian” religion as such.)
His love for the poor and underprivileged (he didn’t just “reach out” with superficial compassion, he actually lived among them and cared for them with own hands), his daily spiritual habits and health regimes, his methods for political change and techniques against civil disobedience; They all affected personal individuals, countless groups of people, powerful governments, and entire nations. Yet, his personal writings reveal a life of struggle, dissatisfaction and a never-ending search for further pureness.
The extreme example of the opposing side: King Solomon. I think most recognize that name, too. Perhaps the richest, wisest, and most powerful king who ever lived, Solomon experienced luxury and decadence to the extreme. A quick read through Ecclesiastes testifies of all the palaces and possessions he owned. Yet, mixed throughout his descriptions of opulence are laments of realization. Everything is vanity. Meaningless. Absurd. Useless. He searched for the utmost wisdom and concluded that “In much wisdom is much grief: and he that increases knowledge increases sorrow”. Ecc 1:18 He gathered great wealth and indulged every desire, yet looked at it all in the end and said, “All was vanity and vexation of spirit, and there was no profit under the sun.” Ecc 2:11
“Well, of course” you answer. “We all know that money can’t buy happiness.” Is that all he’s saying, though? Do we really think it’s that simple? Interspersed throughout his writing are things like “A feast is made for laughter, and wine makes merry: but money answers all things.” (Ecc 10:19) And what about 9:7, “Go thy way, eat thy bread with joy, and drink thy wine with a merry heart; for God now accepts thy works” and Chapter 2:11 where it reads, “There is nothing better for a man, than that he should eat and drink, and that he should make his soul enjoy good in his labor. This also I saw, that it was from the hand of God.”
How do you marry seemingly contradictory ideas of enjoyment and vanity?
I think he touches upon a really powerful thought when he says, “Folly is set in great dignity, and the rich sit in low places.” (10:6). He mentions often that death happens to all, and that a foolish man will gain the wiser man’s riches. It’s not fair. It’s not comforting to our tidy beliefs about how the world should work. (And it seems in direct contradiction to the Proverb’s teachings that wisdom and righteousness equals reward and blessing, but that’s another topic!) Even if you have years of happiness, don’t forget the many days of sorrow. (11:8) Rain falls on the righteous man as well as the evil one, and we are all dust anyways, so deal with it, he seems to say.
So why bother with anything? you might reply in sarcasm.
One can sow seed and have no idea whether it will bring harvest, but you still have to do it. (11:6) We are here on this earth to do, to live, to be. The seeming contradiction of labor profiting nothing is answered by “Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with your might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, where you are going.” (9:10).
In other words, it really doesn’t make a difference in the precise thing. You can live extravagantly and miss true enjoyment, and live simply only to miss real wholesomeness. We tend to focus on the what and how, instead of realizing that significance doesn’t come from any of those things. They are only our frail attempts at representing what is in our heart and minds. They are little pictures of our yearnings and what we treasure most. But they cannot take the place of it. We think we understand it, but then end up implying that by living a certain way we will benefit our soul.
It’s a constant tension.
A constant tension between acting out our beliefs and understanding that it doesn’t make us worthy of anything, between choosing something meaningful and recognizing that the thing, act, or choice really has no meaning.
It is our heart that truly matters. It is seeing beyond, into what we are learning, how it is growing us, why we are doing it. What is the point of living simply if your heart is full of self-righteousness? What is the point of living extravagantly if your heart is full of pride? We all battle with our inner selves that screams for recognition and fulfillment, and even the most spiritual person falls prey to it by connecting their lifestyle choice to their happiness and even worthiness.
It is only through acknowledging that it is our response that really matters that we can appreciate the implications of our choices.
Joy, fulfillment, or even growth cannot come from a lifestyle choice. It isn’t anything of significance, yet it signifies everything. We should be equally content in a hut or a palace. True awareness and gratitude comes when we see the fruits to be enjoyed from both places.
When we can gaze at a wildflower with the same appreciation as at a costly diamond.
When we can take some measure of satisfaction in both expensive well-made clothing and homemade butter.
When we can look forward to an evening of lying in an old lawn chair watching our children play as much as attending a concert or orchestra.
When we enjoy seeing a chicken peck the ground as much as we enjoy smelling that “new car” smell.
Yes, all is meaningless. It also means everything. Paradox. Tension. Because its really about how our heart answers the question of how we choose to live. It’s about we how we deal with it, not what we are dealt with. We will tend towards one over the other, but let’s not forget that instead of simple versus extravagance, may we strive to live simply extravagant or extravagantly simple.
Tags: Christianity, simplicity, spirituality, worldview