Archive for June, 2009

30
Jun

Quit murmuring…

   Posted by: Tamra    in Spiritual

“I hear so many Christians MURMURING about their imperfections, and their failures, and their addictions, and their shortcomings… and I see so little WAR!!!!”

Tags: ,

29
Jun

One flock

   Posted by: Tamra    in Spiritual, Writings

John 10:16 “And I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice. So there will be one flock, one shepherd.

So, what is Jesus talking about?  There are some clues in the Old and New Testaments.

Isaiah 56:8 “The Lord God, who gathers the outcasts of Israel, declares, “I will gather yet others to him besides those already gathered.”

Ephesians 2:12-18  “Remember that you were at that time separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world.  But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ.  For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments and ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the hostility. And he came and preached peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near. For through him we both have access in one Spirit to the Father.”

To whom are these verses referring to?  Who will be made into one body (one flock)?

The answer is plain through the reading of the entire chapters in which the verses are found.  But perhaps it is most clear in Colossians 3.

Colossians 3:11 and 15 “Here there is not Greek and Jew, circumcised and uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave, free; but Christ is all, and in all.  And let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, to which indeed you were called in one body.

All throughout his life, Jesus referred to the changes that were taking place, in that salvation would be offered to the Gentiles.  In John 10 when Jesus is speaking of the “one flock” that will be, He is speaking to the Jews and referring to the Gentile nation.

As the Gospel was preached to the Gentiles and many were saved, Jews and Gentiles had difficulty reconciling their differences.  Colossians and Ephesians are rich with the authors urging them to be united in Christ, as they were called into one body through Him.

Some of you are probably scratching your head, wondering why on earth I would be making a point about something so obvious as what is meant by “one flock”.

All I can say is, be thankful.

Tags: ,

26
Jun

Bees, chickens and goats

   Posted by: Tamra    in Homemaking, Outside the box

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Tags: ,

25
Jun

Stumbling over cake

   Posted by: Tamra    in Outside the box, Spiritual, Writings

Is it okay to serve a sugary dessert when a diabetic friend is part of the group?  Should you just assume they’ll refrain from partaking if they need to?

What if you know they struggle with choosing wise foods, and have ended up in the ER after eating too much sugar?

Or what if a friend battles health issues due to being overweight?  Is it okay then to still serve a dessert?  They obviously have not practiced moderation, despite the consequences.

If overeating is gluttony, and gluttony is a sin, is it okay to urge someone to have your dessert if they have initially said they’re too full?

What about coaxing a friend to have a bigger helping, or even a second helping of dessert?

Is it okay to refer to a dessert in your Facebook status?  Even though there’s a possibility that someone who abuses food could read it and end up bingeing?

Is it admissable to order a dessert at a restaurant?  Since 63% of Americans are overweight and 31% are obese, there are sure to be a large percentage of patrons there who will see your dessert.  What if someone you attend church with happens to come in the restaurant, sees you eating your dessert and it weakens their resolve to avoid sweets?

Is it okay to plan an entire gathering around food, and then include some friends who are overweight?

Can you justify posting photos of a birthday cake?  What if someone considers it to be food porn?

If a friend dies from complications that stem from being overweight or diabetic, how responsible are you if you ever served, ordered, ate, or gave them dessert?

Is it defensible to eat dessert and drive?

Tags: ,

23
Jun

Gays are good evangelists

   Posted by: Tamra    in Outside the box, Spiritual, Writings

I’m heading into controversial territory today.

Yesterday I called Christians out for being rude.  Now I’m going to suggest that Christians could learn a thing or two from the gay community.

If there’s any group that Christians feel justified being rude to, it’s the gay community.  It’s easy to condemn from afar.  To lump them with the leather-clad paraders you see on television.  (That’s about as fair as lumping Christians in with the abortion clinic bombers.)  Yet, people who know a gay personally have only good things to say.

Gays are an example of good evangelism. Speaking from personal observation, they are conscientious neighbors,  proficient business owners, and thoughtful volunteers.  They are known for their kindness and, at least here in Flint, their well-kept homes.  Others in their proximity come to respect them, and value them as friends and colleagues.

Even in a larger sense, the overall perspective of gays is increasingly positive.  Just look at current movies .  In almost every film made in the past couple years, there is a gay part.  It’s usually an attractive, well-dressed and very caring male with a great sense of humor.

If a Christian is in a movie, they are an unhappy over-religious bigot driven by guilt and fear.

Christians would like to decry these characterizations as a result of a media push to normalize something that ought not be, and to censure something else they just don’t like.  But perhaps they are simply representations of the general public’s opionion, based on personal experience.  That’s scary.

Even if you adamantly disagree with the gay lifestyle, it is difficult, if not impossible to dismiss a gay on a personal, individual level.  Shouldn’t the same hold true for Christians?  If a Christian is to be dismissed, it should be due to a rejection of the Gospel, not because he is a jerk.

Preaching the Gospel isn’t simply about quoting Bible verses and spewing Thou-shalt-not’s to people who have no reason to care.

You preach the Gospel by how you live your life. Jesus should be living through you - your hands, mouth and feet.  People will listen to what you have to say when you gain their respect and admiration by showing God’s love, grace and mercy to them, regardless of whether or not they deserve it.  You certainly didn’t deserve it, and neither did I.

p.s.   The Gospel isn’t preached by refusing to patron a business owned by a gay person, either.  What exactly does that prove anyways, except that they are correct in thinking that you’re an idiot.

p.p.s.   I do hold the belief that the Bible teaches homosexuality is a sin.  Just as fornication, pride and dishonoring your parents are sins.  It is possible to treat someone lovingly while not condoning their particular transgression.  That’s what Jesus did.

Tags: , , ,

22
Jun

That’s just rude

   Posted by: Tamra    in Spiritual, Writings

Being a Christian isn’t an excuse for rude behavior.

The very fact that one is a Christian, which simply means they are saved by grace thru faith in Christ, should cause them to be one of nicest persons anyone has the blessing of meeting!

Otherworldly joy should spark attractive behavior such as humbleness, acts of service, patience, kindness, consideration for others above themselves, giving, honesty.  People should notice their willingness to work, good stewardship in money and possessions, and most of all, a true love for others.

How do unbelievers view you?

Are you the stranger who doesn’t seem to care about anyone outside your circle?  Are you the snob who is afraid you might get some of their sin on you?  Are you the hypocrite who is quick to point out their failures?  Are you the selfish one who won’t make time to get to know them?  Are you the jerk who tries to send a “message” by condemning?  The nay-sayer?  The boycotter?

The Gospel is enough to offend.  You don’t have to be offensive.

Those who know what you stand for and believe in will either accept it or reject it.  That is in God’s hands.  But what about your testimony as neighbor and fellow sojourner in this life with unbelievers? Are you someone others enjoy being around, whose friendship people seek after?  Are you quick to smile and even quicker to offer a helping hand?

It is a tragedy when Christians twist verses about being “separate from” or “hated by” the world into pat excuses for being unloving. Christ alone should be the “stumbling block” or the “foolishness” that some reject, not your poor attitude.

Get out of your self, your agenda, your excuses, your selfishness, your presuppositions, your unrighteous judgment, your habits, your upbringing, your tradition, your SIN

And be nice.

Tags: ,

19
Jun

Photo Friday

   Posted by: Tamra    in gardening

Finally got some plants in our potager garden.
Photobucket

A variety of vegetables and herbs, from Simple Times Farm and the Flint Farmer’s Market.
Photobucket

Also planted some hostas, fern, shrubs and a tree in our shade garden.
Photobucket

A lovely beast that I’m trying to figure out what to do with. Make a patio under it? What should I grow on it? (preferably something edible) Hmm.
Photobucket

And random pics of some of the children..
Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Tags: ,

18
Jun

Homeopathy

   Posted by: Tamra    in Spiritual, Writings, health

In the early 1800’s, a physician named Samuel Christian Freidrich Hahnemann started to become very disillusioned with medicine.  When he protested against the common brutal practices of the day, like blood-letting, he was denounced by his colleagues for heresy.  He gave up practicing medicine and turned to medical translating.

While translating lectures by William Cullen, he came across the opinion that cinchona bark (quinine) cured intermittent fever (malaria) because of its astringent and bitter qualities.  Hahnemann questioned this explanation, since other equally bitter substances had no effect on the sickness.  So, he experimented on himself.

Proceeding to take a small amount of quinine twice a day, he soon developed symptoms of malaria.  The symptoms would last two or three hours each time.  Once discontinuing the doses, he returned to good health.  He reasoned that malaria was cured by quinine due to the fact that it produces the symptoms of malaria in a healthy person.

The fact that a remedy can cure a disease if it produces in a healthy person symptoms similar to those of the disease, is called the Law of Similars.  It simply means, Like is cured by like.

The long list of homeopathic remedies were found by testing substances of each remedy on a group of healthy people and recording consistent experiences, such as dizziness or a red face.  These tests conformed to the standard double-blind method used in pharmacology, as one half of the group were used as controls and given a placebo.

Homeopathy uses what medical doctors call the immunological defense mechanism.  For example, let’s say a person has insomnia because he is excited about something that is going to take place the next day.  The anticipation is keeping him from having a restful night’s sleep.  So, he takes Coffea cruda, which is made from coffee beans.  We know what coffee usually does in a healthy person – it keeps them awake!  So, when the remedy is taken, his immunological defense mechanism is automatically provoked to throw off the effects of the remedy.  In doing so, the existing imbalance is also cleared and he is able to fall asleep.

To prepare a remedy, a certain plant, mineral, or animal part is mixed with water.  For a ‘C’ remedy, it is 1 part of the substance to 99 parts water (equaling 100).  For an “X” remedy, it is 1 part substance to 9 parts water (equaling 10).  The mixture is then shaken (succussed).  The dilution is repeated and again succussed.  For example, Arnica 6X means that 1 part Arnica was mixed with 9 parts water and shaken.  Then, that mixture was diluted 1 part to 9 parts water again and succussed.  Dilution and succession were repeated 6 times, thus the 6X.

The higher the dilution, when prepared in this manner by succession, the greater the potency of the remedy.  Dilutions can even continue to the point in which the resulting medicine contains absolutely no molecules of the original substance!  Yet, is not a placebo effect, as it works equally well on infants and pets, even if they are entirely unaware anything was administered.

So how does homeopathy work?  Most homeopaths would say they really don’t know.  It is this inability to explain exactly how homeopathy works that has caused several Christians to caution against it.  What I caution against is using an ungodly worldview as our basis.  I believe the above facts actually prove God’s hand!  Let me explain why.

I’ll start with an experiment that was conducted by a scientist named Rudolf Hauschka using two types of benzoic acid.  One type was synthetically derived from coal tar while the other was simply a natural source.  Chemically, the two samples seemed identical.  Hauschka proceeded to process both into homeopathic remedies, using the methods of dilution and succession as previously described.  The result was that the remedy made from the natural benzoic acid had healing properties, while the remedy made from the synthetic sample had none.

The composition of a plant is so complex that no scientist can possibly know all the constituents.  Therefore, it is impossible to synthesize the entire plant.  Because of this, medicines are often made by isolating known compounds, or the ‘active ingredients’ from a plant, synthesizing them in a lab, and using them to make an imitation.  But as we can see from the experiment above, much is missing from what man attempts to re-create.  Hauschka concluded, “A basic biological difference exists between natural and synthetic products despite their chemical identity”.

There are two concepts at work here.  First, is the fact that man is not God.  God alone is the Creator of all things.  It is nothing new that man desires to be as God, but the fact remains that although we have the ability to invent and make things, we simply cannot create something out of nothing.  Second, he created simply by His spoken word.  Even if we did have all the materials needed to make a plant, it could never be the same since it was not created in the same manner.  We cannot simply speak and have things appear.

When man plays God and tries to re-create a substance in a lab, the results, while somewhat effective, are so pitiful it is almost laughable when compared to the real deal.  Even with all our grand instruments and abilities, our efforts produce results that only minutely reflect the original creation.

Hauschka’s experiment is just one example of how using the plant as a whole is to our advantage.  Drying plants and using them in teas, poultices, and in capsules is one way.  Distilling the plant to obtain the oils is even better, as it is the plant oil that contains all the constituents of the plant.  Succussing (shaking) in a medium, which is how homeopathic remedies are prepared, is yet another way to obtain the healing abilities of a plant, and proves most of all, the evidence of God’s hand in his Creation; the plants, minerals, and animals.

It really shouldn’t come as a surprise to Christians that while we cannot measure the material substance in homeopathic remedies, the healing ability is there.  Why would that be frightening?  Is our faith to be place in man’s instruments?  If they are not capable of measuring something, could that simply show the limits of man’s capabilities?

Even after much study, I cannot claim that I fully understand homeopathy.  It is a difficult concept to grasp how the essence of material can bring about the body’s ability to heal.  But the little I do know seems to prove the existence of God and how He works.  It furthers my appreciation for God’s creation and the amazing way he fashioned nature.

In closing, I want to share what a friend of mine emailed me.  She writes…

I was reading this morning in one of my Dad’s collections of sermons by C. H. Spurgeon.  I am always amazed at how the “Prince of Preachers” can take a seemingly obscure verse, or a fragment of a verse, and find so much truth in it that there is sure to be something that speaks to anyone who reads it!  On that note, the sermon I read this morning had something that I never expected to see, and I had to share with you! The sermon is titled “The Victory of Faith”, and the verse is I John 4.

“For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world; and this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith.”

After several pages of expounding eloquently on the Greatness of the Victory,  The Great New Birth that is implied, and the Great Grace that is given, Spurgeon penned (and spoke) this interesting and enlightening paragraph…

“I want to tell you how it is that faith helps Christians to overcome the world.  It always does it homeopathically.  You say, ’That is a singular idea.’  So it may be.  The principle is that, ”like cures like.”  So does faith overcome the word by curing like with like. How does faith trample upon the fear of the world? By the fear of God.   ”Now,” says the world, “if you do not do this I will take away your life.  If you do not bow down before my false god, you shall be put in yon burning fiery furnace.”  “But,” says the man of faith, “I fear Him who can destroy both body and soul in hell.  True, I may dread you, but I have a greater fear than that.  I fear lest I should displease God; I tremble lest I should offend my Sovereign.”  So the one fear counterbalances the other.  How does faith overcome the world’s hopes?  “There,”  says the world, “I will give thee this, I will give thee that, if thou wilt be my disciple. There is a hope for you; you shall be rich, you shall be great.”  But, faith says, “I have a hope laid up in heaven; a hope which fadeth not away, eternal, incorrupt, amaranthine hope, a golden hope, a crown of life;”  and the hope of glory overcomes all the hopes of the world.  “Ah,” says the world, “Why not follow the example of your fellows?”  “Because,” says faith, “I will follow the example of Christ.”  If the world puts one example before us, faith puts another.  “Oh, follow the example of such a one; he is wise, and great, and good,” says the world.  Says faith, “I will follow Christ; He is the wisest, the greatest, and the best.”  It overcomes example by example.  “Well,” says the world, “since thou will not be conquered by all this, come, I will love thee; thou shalt be my friend.”  Faith says, “He that is the friend of this world, cannot be the friend of God.  God loves me.” So he puts love against love; fear against fear; hope against hope; dread against dread; and so faith overcomes the world by like curing like.”

Originally published June 2007

Tags: , , ,

17
Jun

Overheard

   Posted by: Tamra    in Children's conversations

Spence (3) and Carmen (5) are helping me with the landscaping.  I ask Carmen to bring me the watering can that is nearly full of water.  She struggles, but manages to lug it to me.  Spence is watching her, holding his trusty little shovel.

Spence: I could lift that.

Carmen:  No!  It’s really, really heavy.

Spence: Yeeaaah! I could lift that!

Carmen: Well, I could lift it with just one hand.  If I wanted to, I could.

Spence:  Awesome.

(pause)

Carmen:  You’re not cool when you say that.

Spence:  Yeeeaah.

(long pause)

Spence: Awesoooooome.

Tags: ,

16
Jun

This could’ve been my rant

   Posted by: Tamra    in Home Learning

Yeah, I’m linking to Seth Godin again. This time he’s writing about textbooks - how they’re expensive, out-of-date, impractical… just to name a few of their shortcomings.

Of course, he’s referring to college textbooks, and he goes as far as saying that assigning textbooks is academic malpractice.  As a home schooling mother who has researched several curriculum sets, I think the same could be said for any grade level of textbooks.

Which is why we purposefully limit the usage of them in our studies.  If children are taught how to learn, instead of simply attempting to pour a list of facts in their brain to memorize and immediately forget, they will far exceed what any textbook could do.

Is it important for a child to have the ability to regurgitate an accumulation of facts? Facts that some random textbook author deemed acceptable enough to put into print for the sole purpose of profit.  Should they be taught to be spoon-fed?

Or should they be guided into a lifelong love of learning, where they desire to discover new things, know where to begin looking for the answers, and have the determination to research it?

Tags: ,