That “s” word again
I was recently asked about socialization.
Honestly, I try so hard not to roll my eyes whenever someone brings that up. To me, it shows the tendency humans have to simply parrot something they heard without actually thinking it through.
Behind the socialization question is the assumption that children are socialized via spending the majority of their time with other children of the same age. Really? Who came up with this definition?
Now, seeing as though the socialization question always arises from the subject of home schooling, behind that assumption is another assumption; School (government or private) is the best place for socialization to occur. In actuality, I would dare say that teachers, in an effort to accomplish any education, waste a large portion of their time discouraging socialization. No talking. No passing notes. Stand in single file, facing ahead. Keep your desks in rows. Stop whispering.
For most school children, recess is the only time that one can engage in any real form of socializing. But I am told that many schools have now whittled recess down to a tiny portion of the children’s day, and some schools have tossed it out altogether. In the schools’ defense, they’ve finally realized that recess usually involves undesirable consequences like bullying and injuries, and they’ve rightly concluded that really isn’t what socialization is about.
So what is socialization about?
Wikipedia describes it as “the process of inheriting norms, customs and ideologies. It may provide the individual with the skills and habits necessary for participating within their own society; a society itself is formed through a plurality of shared norms, customs, values, traditions, social roles, symbols and languages. Socialization is thus ‘the means by which social and cultural continuity are attained’.”
This raises several questions. What ‘norms, customs and ideologies’ are children ‘inheriting’ in a school setting? Are they valuable and beneficial? Should this be the role of school? If schools are supposed to ’supply the skills and habits necessary to participate within society’ and a society is a ‘plurality of shared norms, customs, values, traditions, social roles, symbols and languages’, how exactly does school accomplish this goal?
If a truly sociable person is an individual who can engage and relate with many people of different ages, race, income, and religion, one could say that students could learn those skills through making friends with other students who are different from them. And yet, walk in any school and you will notice the self-segregated groups. Private schools especially discourage diversity, just by their very nature. There are, perhaps, fewer things as unbreakable and damaging as cliques, and schools are a breeding ground for them. That mindset develops into a way of life. Look at how many actually believe that it’s advantageous to live in places like subdivided neighborhoods or retirement communities. Check out most people’s friends, on Facebook or real life. We love homogeneous puddles of indistinguishable identity.
But here’s an interesting side note. When socialization is brought up, I have found that most people who are concerned about the socialization of home schooled children are usually troubled about the possibility of them missing out on playing sports or attending prom. Even setting aside the fact that some home schoolers do, in fact, still participate in those things… Are parents so small minded and compliant that they view such things as imperative to a child’s development?
The sad thing is, all of this just points to a disheartening reality; The typical parent isn’t as concerned about little Junior becoming a well-rounded, neighborly, free-thinking adult as much as they are worried about him reflecting well on them as a parent, fitting in, and adhering to their specific subculture’s definition of “cool”.
Tags: homeschool, idiocy, presuppositions









